Who is predicted to win MIA vs WSH on June 1, 2026?

Based on 10,000 Pitch Sim v5.3 Monte Carlo simulations, WSH is favored with a 57.5% win probability. The simulation's mean projected score is WSH 5.6 - MIA 5.0.

How does Olympus Bets generate sports predictions?

Every projection is produced by a league-specific Monte Carlo simulation engine (10,000+ iterations per game), Platt-scaled and isotonic-calibrated against historical outcomes, then sized with the Kelly Criterion plus a 15% Bayesian probability shrinkage. The full methodology is documented at https://app.olympus-bets.com/methodology.

MIA vs WSH Prediction & Picks — June 1, 2026

MIA vs WSH prediction for June 1, 2026: Our Monte Carlo simulation ran 10,000 game iterations and projects WSH 5.6 - MIA 5.0. WSH is favored with a 57.5% win probability. The run line is -1.5 and the total is 8.0. Model projects 10.5 total runs.

WSH

5.6

Projected Score

VS O/U 8.0

MIA

5.0

Projected Score

Win Probability

57.5%

42.5%

WSHMIA

-1.5

Run Line (WSH)

8.0

Total Line

10,000

Simulations

☑ Calibrated accuracy at this confidence: 54.1% (2,300 games)

Projected Runs Range 10th – 90th percentile

MIA

357

WSH

468

Starting Pitcher Matchup

Sandy Alcantara R

MIA

SI23%97 mph7% whiff

CH22%91 mph32% whiff

FF20%97 mph12% whiff

Cade Cavalli R

WSH

FF34%96 mph17% whiff

KC29%85 mph41% whiff

SI16%96 mph11% whiff

Weather Impact

Nationals Park

79°F5 mph wind

HR: 1.039 Total: 1.021

neutral

Bullpen Comparison

MIA

3.43ERA

3.52FIP

9.59K/9

4.45BB/9

1.18WHIP

WSH

4.48ERA

4.49FIP

8.33K/9

3.63BB/9

1.33WHIP

Betting Edges

RUN_LINE AWAY +1.5

-40.1% EV

-179

TOTAL UNDER 8.0

-32.9% EV

-102

TOTAL OVER 8.0

+11.3% EV

-120

F5 OVER 4.5

+10.8% EV

+102

ML AWAY

-6.1% EV

+120

F5_ML HOME

-5.4% EV

-147

First 5 Innings & NRFI

MIA F5

2.6 runs

38.0% win

WSH F5

3.1 runs

48.5% win

F5 Total

5.7

NRFI

48.6%

YRFI

51.4%

Avg 1st Inn Runs

1.15

HR Spotlight

Avg HRs

2.8

Over 0.5 HR

93%

Over 1.5 HR

75%

No HR

Pitcher Strikeout Projections

Sandy Alcantara

0.0 K projected

MIA | K/9: 0.0

Cade Cavalli

0.0 K projected

WSH | K/9: 0.0

Injury Report

MIA8 injured

Andrew Nardi RP15-DAY-IL

Janson Junk SP15-DAY-IL

Eury Perez SP15-DAY-IL

Griffin Conine LF10-DAY-IL

Kemp Alderman RFDAY-TO-DAY

Thomas White SPDAY-TO-DAY

+2 more

WSH8 injured

Dylan Crews CFDAY-TO-DAY

Max Kranick RP60-DAY-IL

Tyler Stuart SPDAY-TO-DAY

Jake Irvin SP15-DAY-IL

DJ Herz SP60-DAY-IL

Trevor Williams SP60-DAY-IL

+2 more

AI Intelligence Analysis

Cavalli's K-rate edge over Alcantara in friendly spot

YELLOW ZONE54.2% WR (n=8)

Cade Cavalli (10.3% K, B grade) is a clear upgrade over Sandy Alcantara (6.2% K, B- grade with weak stuff). That's a 4.1-point K-rate mismatch favoring the home team at neutral Nationals Park (79.3F, open roof, slight tailwind). Model projects WSH 61.4% win prob but market prices 58.8% — a 2.9% edge. Miami's 26-34 record (5th NL East) gives no reason to trust the underdog. Home favorite zone (MLB|ml|any|home) shows 60.3% WR on 83 picks — GREEN combo. Lean WSH ML with light sizing (0.75 units).

Pitcher mismatch: Cavalli 10.3% K rate (B) vs Alcantara 6.2% K rate (B-, stuff C). 4.1 point K-rate gap = 3-4 points swing in ace matchup logic.
WSH home field (Nationals Park, open air, 79.3F, 3.1 mph tailwind): Neutral weather, slight park boost (HR mult 1.039, neutral overall). Not a major edge but supports lean.
+ 2 more factors with Premium

PITCHER MISMATCHGREEN ZONE

🔒Full analysis, risk factors, and recommended action available with PremiumUnlock

Edge Analysis

Moneyline

WSH 57.5%

+2.2 pts

Run Line

-1.5

+2.2 pts

Total

8.0

+11.3 pts

More Projections Today

MLBLAD vs ARI+26.4%MLBTEX vs STL+25.3%MLBCWS vs MIN+22.4%

How this prediction was generated: This page shows output from the Olympus Bets MLB Baseball Monte Carlo engine. Each game is simulated 10,000 times using real-time team data, injury reports, and current odds. Probabilities are calibrated using Bayesian methods and sized via the Kelly Criterion. Full methodology →

MIA vs WSH Prediction